Runtime vs Factory
Runtime is the agent harness for payment teams beyond engineering: ops, risk, compliance, and support. Factory builds Droids, AI agents for enterprise software engineering. Compare fit.
TL;DR: Runtime is the stronger choice for the operations teams around the code: payment ops, risk, compliance, and support, with engineering keeping control. Factory is a leading platform for autonomous software engineering.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Agent harness for payment and risk ops | AI agents for software engineering |
| Users | Ops, risk, compliance, support, plus engineering | Software engineers |
| Software engineering depth | Runs Claude Code, Codex, and OpenCode | Purpose-built Droids across the SDLC |
| Operations workflows | Core use case | Not the focus |
| Non-engineers build agents | Yes, from plain English and SOPs | Engineer-facing |
| Runs in your cloud | Yes, or fully self-hosted | Enterprise deployment options |
| Approvals on money movement | Built in | Not applicable |
| Payments domain depth | Processor codes, bank files, network rules | General software |
Factory and Runtime at a glance
Factory builds Droids, AI agents that implement, test, review, and maintain software across the development lifecycle. Large engineering organizations use them for migrations, code review, documentation, and incident response, from the IDE, CLI, Slack, or Linear.
Runtime is the AI agent harness for payment teams. From payment ops to risk, compliance, and support, anyone on the team can build agents that work their queues on their own computers inside your cloud, called from Slack, Teams, email, SMS, or voice, with approvals and a full audit trail.
Factory is for engineering organizations shipping software. Runtime is for the payment, risk, and finance teams that run the business on top of it.
How they differ
Fintech operations, not the SDLC
Droids are tuned for the software lifecycle. Runtime agents are built for money movement: processor reason codes, ACH returns, bank files, network rules, reserves, and settlement. The users are ops analysts writing SOPs, not engineers writing tickets.
Bring your own cloud, sandbox, and models
Runtime runs agent computers in your AWS, GCP, or Azure account, or fully self-hosted via Helm. You can use your own sandbox provider and any model, including open-weight models served in your cloud for PCI and PII work.
Harness and model routing
Runtime routes work across Claude Code, Codex, and OpenCode and across models, with fallbacks when a provider goes down. Engineering can use the same harness for coding tasks while ops teams run their agents on it.
Guardrails and an FDE who knows payments
Ops agents act on money, so Runtime agents start read-only, ask for approval before anything moves money, and record every query, tool call, approval, and cost. A forward-deployed engineer with a payments background maps your processes and builds the first agents with your team.
Where Factory is stronger
- Software engineering depth. Purpose-built Droids across implementation, testing, review, and maintenance.
- Engineering workflows. Migrations, code review, documentation, and incident response.
- Developer surfaces. Works from the IDE, CLI, Slack, and Linear.
- Large engineering organizations. Built for engineering productivity at scale.
Which should you choose
Choose Factory if
- Your users are software engineers
- The work is code: features, migrations, reviews, incidents
- You want agents across the full development lifecycle
- Engineering productivity is the primary goal
Choose Runtime if
- Your users are payment ops, risk, compliance, finance, and support teams
- Agents need to work your ledger, processor, and bank data in your cloud
- You want harness and model routing instead of one vendor's agent
- You need approvals on money movement and an audit trail your sponsor bank will accept
See Runtime on your busiest queue
Bring one SOP. A forward-deployed AI engineer builds the first agent with your team, inside your cloud.
Frequently asked questions
Is Factory good for fintech companies?
Factory is a strong choice for fintech engineering teams that want agents across the development lifecycle. Its Droids are built for software engineers. Runtime is built for the operations teams around the code: payment ops, risk, compliance, finance, and support.
Can non-engineers use Factory or Runtime?
Factory is engineer-facing. On Runtime, ops analysts build agents from their SOPs in plain English, while engineering controls credentials, access, and any code the agents write.
What is the best Factory alternative for payment operations teams?
For payment operations work like held payouts, ACH returns, disputes, and recon breaks, Runtime gives ops teams agents that investigate across your ledger and processor, with approvals before money moves and a full audit trail.
Can Runtime run in my own cloud with my own models?
Yes. Runtime agent computers run in your AWS, GCP, or Azure account, or fully self-hosted, with your own sandbox provider and any model, including open-weight models served in your cloud.
Related comparisons
Runtime vs Devin
Runtime is the agent harness for payment teams, with agents for operations work in your cloud. Devin, from Cognition, is an autonomous AI software engineer. Compare users, models, and fit.
Runtime vs Lindy
Runtime is the agent harness for payment teams, with agents that work sensitive queues in your cloud. Lindy is a no-code platform for building AI assistants and agents. Compare fit.
Runtime vs Building Your Own Agent Platform
Should a payment or fintech company build its own AI agent platform or buy one? What it takes to run mission-critical agents in-house, how long it takes, and where Runtime fits.
Runtime vs Gumloop
Runtime is the agent harness for payment teams: agents investigate cases in your cloud, with approvals and an audit trail. Gumloop is a visual AI workflow builder for general business automation.